NOW
AVAILABLE
ON DVD & VIDEO!
Produced
By: MGA FILMS, INC.
Ex. Producers:
Rick Van Vleet
& Steven M. Novak
Directed By: Jason VanVleet
|
|
The
Waco: A New Revelation Story
After
six years of painstaking investigation, the complete
story of the tragedy near Waco is finally coming to light.
Narrated by former FBI Special Agent Dr. Frederic Whitehurst,
this compelling feature-length documentary presents new
revelations about the events that led up to the deaths
of 79 men, women and children at Mt. Carmel.
In the spring of 1998, investigators from MGA Films became the first private
citizens to gain access to the Waco investigation evidence lockers. What
they found was shocking. Upon examination, the evidence gathered under the
supervision of federal officials appeared to contradict the FBI's congressional
testimony, raising serious and disturbing questions about events surrounding
the siege at Mt. Carmel and the deaths of the Branch Davidians.
"Waco: A New Revelation" features interviews with former FBI Special
Agents, former Special Forces and CIA operatives, explosives and weapons experts,
Branch Davidian survivors, Texas and federal officials, including former US Attorney
General Ramsey Clark.
The
film opens with aerial footage of the smoldering Davidian compound. The blackened
rubble resembles a war zone; a voice declares, "my life would change forever
as I came to know what failure means." Over the somber soundtrack, the
comments continue, punctuated with scenes no one wants to remember, but few
can actually forget. Is that a child's toy among the smoldering rubble? Was
that a blackened skull, one wonders, as another voice exclaims, "I have
seen the gates of hell, I have seen the gates of hell."
From
deftly woven scenes of congressional hearings, exclusive behind the scenes
footage from the Waco evidence lockers, television news coverage, archival
footage of the Davidians and interviews with researchers, survivors and law
enforcement officers, the tragic story beings to take shape.
We move to February 28th, 1993, and watch as the ill-fated BATF (Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms) raid on the compound unfolds. Who fired first,
and for what reason? Four BATF agents and six Davidians are killed in the raid.
The surviving Davidians are charged with murder, thus beginning the 51-day
standoff.
That
same evening three Davidians, including Michael Dean Schroeder,
attempt to re-enter Mt. Carmel to join their families.
Schroeder is killed by BATF agents. The film examines the
suspicious events surrounding his death was he in
fact murdered?
We watch the story continue through weeks of negotiations with the Davidians:
the frustrations, the confusion, the antagonism leading up to the decision
by the Justice Department to insert tear gas into the compound.
 |
 |
Then, on the morning of April 19, 1993, we watch as tanks mounted with boom
structures rip holes in the compound walls and insert the tear gas. Still the
Davidians do not come out, and the FBI reports gunfire coming at them from
within the compound. The gassing and demolition of the building continues until
late morning.
Fire suddenly breaks out. We see the flames spread quickly in the wind. The
compound is soon engulfed. Within minutes, 52 adults and 25 children, including
two trauma-born infants, perish in the flames. The fire, the FBI claims, was
started by the Davidians.

But questions surrounding the death of the Davidians and
the official FBI account of the siege persist questions
such as:
Why was there a premature destruction of the crime scene a destruction
that resulted in critical evidence not being recovered?
Why
were shots heard and empty shell casings recovered from
an FBI sniper position when the FBI claims they
did not fire their weapons during the siege? And stationed
at that position: a sniper notorious for his actions at
Ruby Ridge.
Who killed Jimmy Riddle, a Davidian, whose body was found outside the compound
walls? He was shot through the head and his body mutilated by a tank. But where
are the evidentiary portions of his body? Who killed Jimmy Riddle? Was there
more to his death than previously thought?
The questions continue.
 |
 |
Dr. Edward Allard, an infrared expert, analyzed the Forward-Looking Infrared
(FLIR) videotape made by an FBI airplane circling overhead during the siege.
The FLIR videotape shows a tank at the back of the compound. The vehicle discharges
two men who, according to Dr. Allard, fire into the compound with automatic
weapons. Over 60 shots are fired.
Maurice Cox, a former intelligence analyst, testifies in a report that the
flashes seen on the Waco FLIR tape could not be solar reflections. Dr. Frederic
Whitehurst, narrator and former FBI Crime Lab analyst, concurs.
If
the FBI was not shooting, then who was? Was the Delta Force,
an elite counter-terrorist military unit in action at Waco in
violation of federal law prohibiting the use of military
forces against US citizens?
And who started the fire? Why were pyrotechnic devices capable of starting
the fire found in the rubble of the compound if the FBI claims it never used
them? Why were pyrotechnic devices found at all three points of origin of the
fire?
 |
 |
Why were the bodies of 15 Davidians found shot to death near the only undamaged
exit from the compound? Were the flashes on the FLIR tape during the fire actually
gunfire aimed at that exit? And how could the bodies accidentally be left to
decompose before forensic testing could take place?
Why does the evidence seem to indicate that the hole in the top of the church
vault the "bunker" was made by the detonation of a
high-explosive demolition charge? Why were only the bodies of women and children
found in that bunker, and did they die as a result of that explosion?
And finally, why does the evidence show the chain of command during the operation
at Waco leading to the office of Vincent Foster and to the First Lady, Hillary
Rodham Clinton? Was Vince Foster's suicide related to the deaths at Waco? Why
did some of Foster's files on Waco end up missing after his death, and who
appears to have seen them last?
 |
 |
The answers are shocking, the evidence disturbing, and the overall conclusions
difficult to face. But this is the story that couldn't be ignored; the story
of newly uncovered evidence, of missing or destroyed evidence; of shocking
testimony and outright deception. It's a story of human fallibility and the
abuse of power; a story of outsiders and insiders, and the tragic consequences
of violence met with violence.
"Waco:
A New Revelation" is a film America needs to see. |